A Syrian asylum seeker residing at a hotel that has been the focal point of recent anti-immigration protests has been charged with seven offences including sexual assault, in a case that is likely to further inflame tensions over migrant accommodation.
Mohammed Sharwarq, 32, faces two counts of common assault, four counts of assault by beating, and a single count of sexual assault on a man, contrary to section 3 of the Sexual Offences Act 2002. The alleged offences are said to have occurred between 25 July and 12 August, during a period when asylum hotels across Britain have faced increasing scrutiny and protests.
The charges come as the Government struggles to manage public anger over the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with costs running at £8.2 million per day as of March 2024. The accommodation crisis has sparked demonstrations across the country, with protesters citing concerns about community safety and the financial burden on taxpayers.
Sharwarq’s case follows a series of high-profile incidents involving asylum seekers housed in taxpayer-funded hotels. Court monitoring conducted during the first six months of 2025 revealed that hundreds of asylum seekers from hotel accommodation had appeared in court on criminal charges, including 29 sexual crimes cases, seven of which involved alleged rapes.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp has seized upon such cases to criticise the Government’s immigration policies, stating: “Women are being raped and sexually assaulted and even police officers attacked. We know that the nationalities crossing the Channel are 24 times more likely to wind up in prison than average.
The hotel at the centre of Sharwarq’s case has not been officially identified, but it is understood to be one of approximately 277 facilities currently being used to house asylum seekers across the UK, down from 398 in October 2023. The Government has pledged to end the practice entirely but has made limited progress since taking office.
Recent weeks have seen a wave of protests outside asylum hotels across Britain, with demonstrations in Epping, Norwich, Bournemouth, Leeds, Portsmouth, and Altrincham. The protests in Epping, which began after Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl, resulted in 21 arrests and cost Essex Police over £100,000 to manage.
In Norwich, protesters gathered outside a hotel following the jailing of two asylum seekers for serious sexual offences. Dan Tesfalul from Eritrea received eight years for rape, whilst Rashid Al-Waeli was sentenced to 20 months for child sex offences. Demonstrators held placards bearing the offenders’ images and slogans including “deport all foreign rapists and child abusers.”
The incidents have raised questions about vetting procedures for asylum seekers and the wisdom of housing single men in hotels within residential communities. Local residents have expressed fears for their safety, with one Epping resident, Sarah White, stating: “Women and families are terrified. People are living in fear when this is their home. They should not feel unsafe.”
Human rights organisations have condemned what they describe as the scapegoating of all asylum seekers for the actions of individuals. Hope Not Hate warned against “racist violence spurred on by far-right hatred,” whilst acknowledging that anti-asylum seeker hostility has been “stoked by elements of our media and supposedly mainstream politicians.
The controversy surrounding asylum hotels extends beyond criminal cases to the conditions within the facilities themselves. Former residents have described overcrowded rooms, poor sanitation, and mental health crises. One Iranian asylum seeker revealed he had attempted suicide due to the conditions, whilst others reported sleeping on floors and experiencing severe depression.
Despite these conditions, the perception that asylum seekers are living in luxury at taxpayers’ expense has fuelled public resentment. Reform UK chief whip Lee Anderson expressed outrage that “most British people could not afford to stay the weekend” in hotels being used for asylum accommodation, questioning whether it represented good value for taxpayer money.
The Government faces a complex challenge in addressing the asylum accommodation crisis. Home Office data shows that 35,651 people were in hotel accommodation at the end of September 2024, up 21 per cent from June. Nine hotels have closed since the general election, but 15 opened temporarily, with nine more scheduled for closure by March 2025.
Immigration Minister has acknowledged that hotel use is “undesirable and not value for money,” but has not provided a timeline for ending the practice entirely. The Labour manifesto promised to end asylum hotel use, but progress has been hampered by rising Channel crossings and a backlog of cases awaiting determination.
As Sharwarq’s case proceeds through the courts, it is likely to become another flashpoint in the heated debate over immigration policy. The charges against him, particularly the sexual assault allegation, will inevitably be seized upon by those calling for stricter controls on asylum seekers and an end to hotel accommodation.
For communities hosting asylum hotels, the case reinforces existing anxieties about safety and integration. For asylum seekers themselves, it risks further stigmatisation and hostility from a public already divided on immigration issues.
The broader context includes Syria’s ongoing humanitarian crisis, with human rights organisations documenting torture, disappearances, and persecution of those who fled the Assad regime. However, such nuances are often lost in the polarised debate surrounding individual criminal cases.
As protests continue and political pressure mounts, the Government faces urgent questions about how to balance its humanitarian obligations with public safety concerns and community cohesion. The outcome of cases like Sharwarq’s will likely influence policy decisions and public opinion for months to come.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
