Birmingham City Council has begun removing Union Jack and St George’s flags from lampposts across the city just days after lighting up the Library of Birmingham in green and white to mark Pakistan’s independence anniversary, sparking fierce debate about cultural priorities.
The flags, which first appeared in Weoley Castle and spread throughout the Northfield area, were erected by what supporters describe as a “patriotic” group of residents. An online fundraiser set up by the “Weoley Warriors” has already raised almost £2,500 to fund more flags, poles and cable ties across Birmingham’s neighbourhoods.
The council’s decision to remove the flags whilst simultaneously celebrating Pakistan Independence Day has drawn sharp criticism from politicians and residents alike, with Reform MP Lee Anderson delivering a scathing response: “If the imbeciles running Birmingham City Council think more about Pakistan than the UK then they should all get on the next flight to Islamabad.
Community Initiative Gains Momentum
The GoFundMe page created by the flag supporters describes the group as “proud English men with a common goal to show Birmingham and the rest of the country of how proud we are of our history, freedoms and achievements.” The fundraisers state they are “giving hope to local communities that all isn’t lost and they are not alone.
The organisers have offered to take “road requests on donation,” leading to flags appearing across multiple areas including Weoley Castle, Northfield, Ley Hill, West Heath and Bartley Green. The patriotic display has generated overwhelming support on social media, with many residents expressing pride in seeing the flags.
“Loving the flags all around Weoley castle, Northfield & Ley hill. It’s a great sight to see keep up the great work lads. I wonder were they will be going up next,” one supporter wrote on Facebook.
Another resident added: “KEEP THE FLAGS It’s nice to see them, made me feel proud driving around the area. I wish there were everywhere. I’ve travelled the world & almost every country I’ve visited had flags everywhere, they’re proud of their country, we should be too.
Council Cites Safety Concerns
Birmingham City Council has justified the removal by claiming the “unauthorised items” could be “putting lives of motorists and pedestrians at risk.” The local authority referenced its ongoing plans to upgrade street lighting to energy-efficient LEDs, stating that lamp columns need to remain free from attachments.
“Work is due to begin imminently, and lamp columns need to remain free from attachments so work can be carried out as quickly and safely as possible,” a council spokesperson stated.
The council revealed that highways staff have already removed around 200 advertising banners and flags attached to lampposts since the start of the year, claiming they “take down attachments from lampposts routinely, including advertising signs, bunting trails and flags.
“People who attach unauthorised items to lampposts could be putting their lives and those of motorists and pedestrians at risk,” the statement continued. “We continuing to do this every week and would ask that staff doing this work are allowed to continue this work unhindered.”
Political Tensions Surface
The flag controversy has taken on political dimensions, with local Conservative councillor Simon Morrall writing an open letter requesting the flags remain until the end of August to celebrate VJ Day. The Birmingham Northfield Reform Facebook account has also expressed support, describing those behind the flags as “fantastic people who are putting a smile on the communities, spreading positivity and proud.
However, not all residents support the display. One anonymous Facebook user expressed discomfort, writing: “When I first saw them I didn’t know what they were for. I thought maybe they were supporting the football or something. Then they started appearing everywhere and I felt really uncomfortable because as the flags grew in number, it felt like Weoley Castle had become a place that was full of people who don’t welcome people of other heritages.”
The resident drew connections to Reform UK, adding: “Looking on here I see it’s linked to English/British pride and in lots of cases, the Reform party. Lots of people don’t support the Reform party, and linking the flags to this party is something some people won’t agree with politically but will feel silenced into speaking up.
Flag Supporters Defend Intentions
In response to criticism, one of the group members responsible for the flags posted anonymously to defend their actions, insisting they were simply being “patriotic” and that the “wrong message” had been portrayed.
“Just came off due to having the wrong message portrayed about us,” the post read. “Patriotic is the only definition of us hatred is not! Love you all for the support, this isn’t going to deter us and we just want to reassure you that your requests will be met and delivered faster than ever now.”
Some concerns have been raised about potential links to more extreme elements. The Birmingham Dispatch reported that a Facebook user called Lee Neal posted a photo showing a man preparing to attach a Union Jack to a lamppost outside a Catholic church, with the text: “flags are going up around the streets of Birmingham, join in lets see your flags going up.
In response to a complimentary comment about the church, Neal reportedly wrote: “Christians and Catholics will have to fight together against the Muslim threat.”
Cultural Double Standards Alleged
The timing of the flag removal has proved particularly controversial, coming immediately after the council lit up the Library of Birmingham in Pakistan’s national colours on 14 August. The library regularly changes its lighting to mark various occasions, but critics argue this demonstrates a double standard.
Political commentator Rakib Ehsan wrote that the incident “will only reinforce the view that many of our public institutions are more than happy to celebrate the national history, heritage, and culture of other countries – especially those where our sizeable ethnic minorities originate from – but are uneasy and squeamish over expressions of British pride and English identity.
He warned this was particularly significant given Birmingham has become a minority white-British city, stating: “It will serve to exacerbate existing feelings of cultural marginalisation among the traditional English working classes, who have already become a minority group in various parts of the country.
Wider Context
The controversy comes amid heightened tensions over immigration and national identity across the UK. Northfield is expected to be targeted by Reform and independent candidates in next year’s local elections, with some residents suggesting the flag scheme could be linked to anti-migrant sentiment.
The situation has highlighted divisions within Birmingham, a city where the white-British population has fallen below 50 per cent according to recent census data. The council’s decision to celebrate Pakistan Independence Day whilst removing British flags has crystallised debates about multiculturalism and national identity in modern Britain.
As the flag removal continues, there are concerns it could trigger protests in the city, with numerous residents expressing support for the initiative and many putting up their own flags or donating to purchase more. The council has asked that workers carrying out the removal are allowed to continue “unhindered,” suggesting awareness of potential confrontations.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
