Hertfordshire Constabulary officer Marcin Zielinski, 27, has been sentenced to four months in prison after Ring camera footage captured him pocketing a woman’s underwear whilst conducting an official search of her property.
A serving police officer who betrayed public trust by stealing intimate clothing during a lawful search has been jailed following shocking footage that exposed his criminal behaviour. Marcin Zielinski, 27, from Shefford, Bedfordshire, was sentenced at Cambridge Crown Court on Monday after admitting to theft and corrupt exercise of police powers.
The disturbing incident, which occurred on 12 September 2024, was captured on Ring camera footage showing the uniformed officer rifling through the woman’s belongings before slipping underwear into his back pocket. The footage reveals Zielinski methodically searching a bedroom before turning his attention to a chest of drawers, where he removed the intimate item from the second drawer.
Criminal conduct during official duties
The court heard that Zielinski was conducting a Section 32 search at a residential property when he committed the offence. Under Section 32 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, officers have the power to search premises where an arrest has been made for evidence relating to an indictable offence.
The woman whose home was searched had been arrested in connection with an unrelated matter but was subsequently released with no further action taken. It was during this routine police procedure that Zielinski exploited his position of authority to commit the theft.
Cambridge Crown Court was told that the officer stole the underwear whilst carrying out his official duties, representing what prosecutors described as a serious breach of public trust. The victim’s arrest proved unrelated to any criminal activity, making Zielinski’s violation of her privacy even more egregious.
Ring camera exposes officer’s betrayal
The damning evidence came from Ring camera footage installed in the property, which clearly showed Zielinski’s calculated actions. The video reveals the officer systematically searching through the woman’s personal belongings before focusing on her chest of drawers.
In the footage, Zielinski can be seen opening the second drawer, removing an item of underwear, and deliberately placing it in his back pocket before leaving the bedroom. The clarity of the recording left no doubt about his criminal intentions.
The existence of the video evidence proved crucial in securing the conviction, as it provided incontrovertible proof of the officer’s misconduct during what should have been a routine police search.
Swift justice following guilty plea
Zielinski appeared in court on 4 August, where he admitted one charge of theft and a charge of corrupt or improper exercise of police powers and privileges by a constable. His guilty plea came in the face of overwhelming video evidence that made any defence untenable.
The 27-year-old officer resigned from Hertfordshire Constabulary in November 2024 whilst under investigation, ending his career in law enforcement under a cloud of disgrace. His resignation came before any disciplinary proceedings could be concluded.
At Cambridge Crown Court on Monday, 18 August, Judge handed down a four-month custodial sentence, reflecting the seriousness of the breach of trust inherent in the offences.
Force condemns ‘fundamental betrayal’
Hertfordshire Constabulary Assistant Chief Constable Genna Telfer delivered a scathing condemnation of Zielinski’s actions, describing them as a betrayal of everything the police service represents.
Zielinski has let down the public of Hertfordshire, the police service as a whole and his former colleagues, who act with professionalism and integrity,” ACC Telfer stated.
She added: “His criminal behaviour damages the reputation of policing and represents a fundamental betrayal of the public and the values for which the police service stands.
The senior officer’s comments reflect the force’s determination to distance itself from Zielinski’s actions and reassure the public about the integrity of the vast majority of officers.
Impact on public trust
The case has raised serious questions about police conduct and the vulnerability of citizens during searches of their homes. The fact that the victim was arrested but later released without charge compounds the violation of trust, as she was subjected to Zielinski’s criminal behaviour whilst cooperating with a lawful police investigation.
Section 32 searches are intended to allow officers to gather evidence following an arrest, with strict limitations on what can be searched and seized. The power exists to help police investigate crimes effectively, but Zielinski’s abuse of this authority undermines public confidence in these necessary police powers.
The presence of home security cameras proved instrumental in exposing the crime, highlighting how modern technology can serve as a safeguard against official misconduct. Without the Ring camera footage, Zielinski’s theft might never have come to light.
Legal framework and police powers
Under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Section 32 provides officers with specific search powers following an arrest. These powers allow police to search arrested persons and, in cases involving indictable offences, to enter and search premises where the arrest occurred or where the person was immediately before arrest.
The legislation includes safeguards, limiting searches to what is reasonably required to discover evidence relating to the offence. Officers can seize items they believe might be used to escape custody or that constitute evidence of an offence.
However, these powers come with clear restrictions and professional standards that Zielinski flagrantly violated. His actions went far beyond any legitimate police purpose, constituting both theft and an abuse of his position.
Sentencing reflects severity
The four-month prison sentence handed down to Zielinski reflects the court’s view of the seriousness of his offences. Theft by a serving police officer, particularly during the execution of official duties, strikes at the heart of public trust in law enforcement.
The additional charge of corrupt or improper exercise of police powers underscores that this was not merely a case of theft, but a fundamental breach of the responsibilities that come with police authority.
Legal experts note that sentences for police officers who abuse their position often reflect the heightened breach of trust involved, as citizens must be able to rely on officers to act with integrity when granted powers to enter homes and conduct searches.
Wider implications for policing
This case comes at a time when police forces across the UK are working to rebuild public trust following various high-profile scandals. The swift action taken against Zielinski, from investigation through to prosecution and imprisonment, demonstrates the commitment to rooting out officers who fail to meet professional standards.
The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of accountability measures in policing, including the value of home security systems in providing evidence when official misconduct occurs. It also highlights the need for continued vigilance in maintaining professional standards within police forces.
As Zielinski begins his prison sentence, Hertfordshire Constabulary faces the task of reassuring the public that his actions were those of one rogue officer and do not reflect the standards of the force as a whole. The case stands as a stark warning to any officer who might consider abusing their position of trust and authority.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
