West Midlands Police have condemned as “completely false” viral claims that they were investigating a child for simply viewing a social media post, stating the circulating footage is “heavily edited” and “misleading.”
The force issued a strong rebuttal on Sunday after online outcry over video clips purporting to show two officers attempting to seize a child’s phone over a social media post they had viewed. The footage sparked widespread criticism on social media, with users condemning what they perceived as police overreach.
However, West Midlands Police revealed they are actually investigating a malicious communications offence after receiving a complaint that a fake social media account had been created to send indecent messages of “an incredibly serious nature” that caused “serious concern for the victim.”
The viral footage was taken during an interaction between officers and the mother of a 13-year-old suspect at her Walsall home on September 13, when police were attempting to speak with the teenage girl as part of their investigation.
“We are aware of reports that we are investigating a child for viewing a social media post. This is completely incorrect,” the force stated emphatically. “We are investigating after a complaint from a member of the public that a fake social media account had been created in their name and had been used to send indecent messages.”
Serious Criminal Investigation
The police clarified that the offence under investigation is malicious communications – specifically sending indecent or grossly offensive communication to cause distress or anxiety. This is a criminal offence under the Malicious Communications Act 1988, which can carry serious penalties including imprisonment.
According to the force, the messages involved are of “an incredibly serious nature” and have caused significant distress to the victim who reported the fake account to police. The investigation centres on allegations that someone created a fraudulent social media account impersonating another person and used it to send indecent messages.
Officers had made multiple attempts to contact the teenage suspect at her home address in Walsall earlier this month as part of their investigation. During the September 13 visit captured in the viral clip, officers spoke with the girl’s mother and explained they needed to interview her daughter and recover her mobile phone as evidence.
‘Heavily Edited’ Footage
West Midlands Police emphasised that the viral video clip shows only a brief portion of the interaction and has been edited in a way that misrepresents the nature of their visit. The force revealed they have reviewed the full 10-minute body-worn video recording of the exchange, which provides complete context missing from the online footage.
“We are aware of a brief and heavily edited video clip showing part of the 13 September visit. The clip is misleading, and we have reviewed a 10-minute body worn video recording showing the full exchange,” the statement explained.
The selective editing appears to have removed crucial context about the serious nature of the investigation, instead creating a false narrative that police were targeting a child merely for viewing content online. This misrepresentation has fuelled online outrage and debate about police powers and free speech.
Investigation Continues
The day after the filmed home visit, on September 14, the teenage girl attended a police station for a voluntary interview. The force stressed this was voluntary, indicating the suspect and her family are cooperating with the investigation.
Police confirmed the investigation remains ongoing, though they provided no further details about the specific nature of the indecent messages or the identity of the victim who made the complaint. The recovery of the mobile phone would be standard procedure in such investigations, as it could contain crucial evidence about who created the fake account and sent the messages.
Online Misinformation Concerns
The incident highlights growing concerns about how edited footage shared on social media can distort public understanding of police investigations. The viral spread of the misleading clips generated significant backlash against West Midlands Police before they had opportunity to clarify the facts.
The force’s detailed response suggests frustration at having to defend legitimate investigative work into serious criminal allegations because of misinformation spreading online. The gap between the edited footage’s narrative – police seizing a child’s phone for viewing posts – and the reality of investigating serious malicious communications demonstrates how quickly false narratives can take hold on social media.
Legal Context
Malicious communications offences are taken seriously by police and prosecutors, particularly when they involve indecent content or impersonation. Creating fake accounts to send offensive messages can constitute harassment, fraud, or malicious communications depending on the specific circumstances.
The mention of “indecent messages” suggests the content could potentially involve sexual material or threats of a sexual nature, though police have not specified this. Such cases often require careful investigation, particularly when minors are involved either as suspects or victims.
The investigation appears to follow standard procedures for such cases, including attempting to interview the suspect, recovering electronic devices that may contain evidence, and conducting voluntary interviews where appropriate. The fact the teenager attended voluntarily suggests the family is engaging with the process.
Public Reaction
The initial online reaction to the edited footage reflected broader concerns about perceived police overreach in monitoring social media activity. Many social media users expressed alarm at what they believed was an investigation into a child simply for viewing content online, with some citing concerns about freedom of expression and proportionality in policing.
However, the police clarification reveals a much more serious investigation into alleged criminal behaviour involving fake accounts and indecent messages causing distress to a victim. This context fundamentally changes the nature of the story from one about police overreach to one about investigating potentially serious online harassment or abuse.
The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of seeking full information before drawing conclusions from social media clips, particularly when they involve ongoing police investigations. It also highlights the challenges law enforcement faces in maintaining public confidence whilst investigating online crimes, particularly when misleading narratives spread faster than factual clarifications.
West Midlands Police’s robust response suggests they are keen to correct the record and maintain public trust whilst continuing their investigation into what they describe as messages of “an incredibly serious nature” that have caused genuine harm to a victim.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
