What Is the BritCard?
The BritCard is a proposed mandatory digital identity system that would require every adult in the UK—both citizens and legal migrants—to carry a smartphone-based credential proving their right to live, work, and access services in Britain. Think of it as a digital passport stored on your phone that you’d need to show when applying for jobs, renting property, or accessing government services.
The proposal, championed by Labour Together—a think tank closely aligned with Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s administration—envisions this as a free app that would be downloaded onto smartphones and linked to government databases. It would use facial recognition and other biometric data to verify identity instantly, with employers, landlords, and service providers using a separate verifier app to check credentials.
Will You Be Fined for Not Having One?
Currently, no—because the BritCard doesn’t exist yet. The UK has no national ID card system, and you cannot be fined for not carrying identification. Britain remains one of the few Western democracies without mandatory ID requirements.
However, if the BritCard becomes law as proposed, the situation could change dramatically. According to reports from IBTimes UK and analysis of the Labour Together proposal:
- Failure to present a BritCard when required could result in:
- Being denied employment
- Being unable to rent property
- Being blocked from accessing certain public services
- Potential fines (amounts not yet specified)
- Employers and landlords would face penalties up to £20,000 for failing to check BritCards, creating de facto compulsion even if the system is technically “voluntary”
The government insists any system would be voluntary, but critics point out that if you need it for work and housing, it becomes mandatory in practice—what civil liberties groups call “compulsion by stealth.”
Is It Actually Happening?
The scheme is under serious consideration but not yet confirmed. Here’s the current status:
- September 2025: PM Keir Starmer confirmed the government is “considering” the proposal
- June 2025: Labour Together published a detailed 30-page blueprint for BritCard
- June 2025: The Data (Use and Access) Act received Royal Assent, creating the legal framework
- Expected timeline: Labour Together suggests announcing intentions by Summer 2025, with potential rollout by 2027
The government has been deliberately vague, with Starmer saying: “We all carry a lot more digital ID now than we did 20 years ago, and I think that psychologically, it plays a different part.”
How Would It Work?
According to the Labour Together proposal, the BritCard would operate through:
For Users:
- Download the GOV.UK Wallet app (or certified alternatives like Apple/Google Wallet)
- Register using GOV.UK One Login with biometric verification
- Store your digital credential containing photo ID and status information
- Present credential when required via QR code or NFC technology
For Verifiers (Employers/Landlords):
- Use a free verifier app to scan credentials
- Instant confirmation of right to work/rent
- Legal obligation to check and record verifications
- Face fines for non-compliance
Technical Specifications:
- Built on existing GOV.UK One Login infrastructure
- ISO/IEC 18013 compliant or W3C Verifiable Credential standard
- Facial recognition and biometric security
- Integration with government databases
- Estimated cost: £140-400 million to build, £10 million annually to run
The Smartphone Problem: What If You Don’t Have One?
This is the scheme’s biggest pitfall. The BritCard assumes universal smartphone ownership, but:
Who Would Be Excluded:
- 2.4 million older people are digitally excluded
- 1.6 million older people (12%) don’t use any mobile phone
- 4.3 million older people (33%) don’t use smartphones
- 7% of UK adults don’t own a smartphone
- 20% of children experience digital poverty
- People unable to afford smartphones or data plans
- Those with disabilities preventing smartphone use
No Clear Solutions Offered:
The Labour Together proposal acknowledges this problem but offers only vague suggestions:
- Possible physical cards as alternatives (details unclear)
- Government offices might provide terminals (locations unspecified)
- Libraries could offer verification services (no concrete plans)
- “Alternative arrangements” for those unable to use smartphones (undefined)
Critics argue this creates a two-tier system where the digitally excluded become second-class citizens, forced to queue at government offices for services others access instantly.
Major Pitfalls and Concerns
1. Privacy and Surveillance
- Big Brother Watch warns: Creates a “papers, please” society
- 101,000+ people have signed petitions against it
- 63% of Brits don’t trust government to protect their data (YouGov poll)
- Creates “treasure trove for hackers” with all data centralised
2. Technical Failures
- What happens when phones die, are lost, or stolen?
- System crashes could paralyse employment and housing
- The existing e-visa system is already “riddled with failures”
- Government IT projects have a dismal track record (remember NHS system was 5x over budget)
3. Discrimination Risks
- Errors could leave people wrongly excluded
- Vulnerable groups most likely to face problems
- Risk of creating “digital apartheid”
- Could push illegal migrants “further into shadows” rather than solving problem
4. Mission Creep
- Initial “voluntary” systems often become mandatory
- Could expand beyond immigration to all services
- Future governments could add new requirements
- No guarantees against function expansion
5. Effectiveness Doubts
- France has mandatory ID but still has illegal immigration
- Employers already required to check status since 1996
- Criminals and smugglers operate “off the books” anyway
- Little evidence it would deter illegal migration
Who Supports It and Who Opposes It?
Supporters Argue:
- Labour Together: Would save billions and control migration
- 80% public support for digital ID in principle (Labour Together polling)
- Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood: Could help enforcement
- Technology sector: Sees opportunity for innovation
Opposition Includes:
- Big Brother Watch: “Uniquely harmful to privacy and civil liberties”
- Liberty, Open Rights Group, and six other rights organisations: Joint letter opposing
- Conservative critics: See it as surveillance state
- Privacy advocates: Warn of irreversible damage to civil liberties
What Happens Next?
Immediate Steps:
- Government conducting “exploratory work”
- Parliamentary inquiry into digital identification ongoing
- Public consultation expected before any legislation
- GOV.UK Wallet launching 2025 (separate but related initiative)
Key Questions Remaining:
- Will it truly be mandatory or “voluntary”?
- How will non-smartphone users be accommodated?
- What safeguards against abuse?
- Can the technology actually work at scale?
- Will Parliament approve such a system?
The Historical Context
This isn’t Britain’s first attempt at national ID:
- 2006: Tony Blair’s ID card scheme launched
- 2010: Coalition government scrapped it after spending millions
- 15,000 cards issued then cancelled with no refunds
- Databases destroyed amid civil liberties concerns
The difference now? Digital technology and the migration crisis have changed the political landscape. But the fundamental tensions between security and liberty remain.
Bottom Line: Should You Worry?
Not immediately—the BritCard doesn’t exist yet and faces massive hurdles. But the proposal represents a fundamental shift in the relationship between citizen and state. If implemented as proposed:
- You’d need it for employment and housing (effectively mandatory)
- Without a smartphone, you’d face serious disadvantages
- Your data would be centralised and vulnerable
- Identity checks would become routine
- The system could expand beyond original intentions
The debate isn’t really about immigration—it’s about whether Britain wants to become a society where proving your identity to the state becomes a daily requirement. History suggests the British public will resist, but in an era of digital transformation and migration anxiety, old certainties no longer apply.
As Rebecca Vincent of Big Brother Watch warns: “This would mark a severe departure from Britain’s long and proud history of resisting mandatory ID.”
The question now is whether that resistance will continue in the smartphone age.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
