Meghan Markle Faces £8 Million Lawsuit After Fan Claims ‘Catastrophic Burns’ from Netflix Bath Salt Recipe

226

In a stunning development that merges celebrity, wellness, and legal drama, Meghan Markle is facing a potential £8 million lawsuit after a fan claimed to have suffered “catastrophic burns” from a DIY bath salt recipe featured in her Netflix show, With Love, Meghan. The episode, which aimed to highlight mindful gifting and wellness rituals, is now under scrutiny after a woman says her attempt to recreate the recipe ended in severe medical trauma. The case raises major questions about the liability of public figures who promote lifestyle and wellness content online.

---

What Sparked the Lawsuit?

The controversy began with an episode of Meghan Markle’s wellness-themed Netflix series, With Love, Meghan, where she shared a homemade bath salt recipe. The ingredients included Epsom salts, Himalayan salt, lavender oil, and arnica oil—commonly used in spa-like treatments.

Robin Patrick, a diabetic woman from Maryland, claims she followed the recipe after watching a clip online. Instead of a relaxing bath, she says she experienced intense burning, ulcers, and blisters, which have now led to long-term injuries and emotional trauma.

Meghan’s Netflix Show: “With Love, Meghan”

The show positions itself as a blend of mindfulness, wellness, and personal storytelling. The bath salt recipe was presented as a simple, luxurious gift idea—one of many suggestions in an episode dedicated to self-care. At no point, Patrick alleges, was a disclaimer provided warning viewers about potential medical risks for people with certain health conditions.

---

The Alleged Incident and Injury

Robin Patrick’s claim details a traumatic experience. Within minutes of soaking in the bath, she began experiencing an extreme tingling sensation. What began as discomfort quickly escalated to unbearable pain. Patrick says she now deals with scarring, anxiety, and ongoing dermatological care—all allegedly due to a recipe she assumed was safe.

Medical Conditions at Play

Patrick lives with Type 2 diabetes and an autoimmune disorder—both conditions that can make the skin more sensitive and susceptible to infection or injury. Her attorneys argue this context should have been anticipated by the producers, especially since Epsom salts carry warnings for those with certain medical conditions.

---

Legal Claims and Accusations

Patrick has filed a pre-litigation demand for £8 million in damages, plus at least £60,000 for immediate medical expenses. Her legal claim centers around:

• Negligence
• Failure to warn
• Emotional distress
• Potential PTSD

She argues that by sharing the recipe without warnings or consultation disclaimers, Markle and her team demonstrated a “reckless disregard for consumer safety.”

The £8 Million Demand

Patrick’s legal team states that the amount reflects both punitive damages and the financial burden of her physical and emotional injuries. It’s also meant to act as a deterrent for other celebrities who might unknowingly promote unsafe or unvetted wellness content.

---

Meghan Markle’s Legal Response

Meghan’s lawyer, Cameron Stracher, responded forcefully, stating that the injuries were not foreseeable. He emphasized that bath products containing Epsom salt already include warning labels and that Markle cannot be held responsible for how viewers interpret lifestyle content.

Could Meghan Be Liable?

Legal experts are split. On one hand, free speech and artistic expression protect most content creators. On the other, if wellness content is construed as medical advice or causes harm, it could potentially create grounds for negligence—especially if no disclaimers are provided.

---

The Role of Netflix and Production Oversight

While Meghan is the face of the show, Netflix and the production company may also be drawn into legal proceedings if the case progresses. Industry experts note that most streaming platforms vet health-related content, but clear warnings or disclaimers are essential—something apparently lacking in this episode.

---

Public Backlash and Mixed Reactions

Social media is divided. Some accuse Patrick of exploiting celebrity status for money. Others say this incident highlights the dangers of unsupervised wellness trends, especially for vulnerable individuals.

Wellness Culture and Influencer Advice

With influencers increasingly dabbling in holistic remedies and DIY cures, this lawsuit might trigger new guidelines or even legislation. Just as the FDA regulates over-the-counter products, there may soon be pressure to regulate public-facing wellness content too.

---

Impact on Meghan’s Brand

Meghan Markle has carefully cultivated a brand centered on compassion, wellness, and empowerment. This legal battle could pose a reputational risk—not only to her personal image but also to her media ventures, partnerships, and Netflix collaborations.

---

Broader Implications for Celebrity Wellness Content

Whether or not this lawsuit succeeds, it’s likely to change the way celebrities share wellness advice online. Moving forward, expect to see more visible disclaimers, legal disclaimers, and health-related content undergoing stricter scrutiny.

---

Conclusion

As this case unfolds, it underscores an important lesson for both celebrities and viewers alike: wellness content is not a substitute for medical advice. While Meghan Markle may not have intended harm, her brand now sits at the center of a legal and ethical debate about accountability, influence, and the risks of oversimplified self-care solutions.

---

FAQs

1. What is the bath salt recipe involved in the lawsuit?
The recipe included Epsom salt, Himalayan salt, arnica oil, and lavender oil—intended as a self-care bath soak.

2. Who is the woman suing Meghan Markle?
Robin Patrick, a diabetic woman from Maryland who claims to have suffered burns and medical complications after using the bath salts.

3. What are the legal claims made?
The lawsuit alleges negligence, lack of warnings, emotional distress, and physical injury, with a demand for £8 million in damages.

4. Has Meghan Markle responded publicly?
Not personally, but her legal team has denied liability, stating the injuries were unforeseeable and product warnings already exist.

5. Could Netflix also be held responsible?
It’s possible if the court finds the platform failed to ensure proper content vetting or disclaimers for health-related materials.