Andrew Johnston, the former Britain’s Got Talent finalist who won hearts across the UK with his angelic voice in 2008, has been cleared of two counts of rape and one of sexual assault after a jury found him not guilty at Southwark Crown Court. The verdict ends a high-profile legal battle that captured national attention, reigniting debates about justice, celebrity, and due process.
Who is Andrew Johnston?
Andrew Johnston first stepped into the public spotlight as a 13-year-old chorister on Britain’s Got Talent. His powerful rendition of “Pie Jesu” earned him a place in the show’s final and a record deal. His debut album, One Voice, reached No. 4 in the UK charts. Johnston quickly became a symbol of triumph over bullying and hardship.
After his rise to fame, Johnston faded from the public eye—until his name resurfaced in connection with serious criminal allegations that would upend his career and life.
Details of the Allegations
The trial revolved around accusations made by two women who claimed Johnston raped and assaulted them in separate incidents. Both alleged he removed condoms during sex without their consent—a practice commonly referred to as “stealthing”—and engaged in unwanted physical aggression, including choking.
First Complainant’s Allegations
The first woman told the court she met Johnston at a London club in 2019. She claimed they went back to his residence where consensual sex began, but he removed his condom without her knowledge. She testified that he also held her down by the throat, making her feel “frozen” and “trapped.” Later, at a nightclub, she alleged Johnston groped her and tried to kiss her without consent.
Second Complainant’s Allegations
The second woman described an encounter at a sex club in 2020, where she said Johnston again removed his condom mid-intercourse despite her repeated objections. She also claimed he placed his hands around her neck multiple times despite her pushing them away.
Inside the Trial
The trial unfolded over several days, with testimony from both complainants, police, and Johnston himself. Prosecutors argued the consistency of both women’s accounts pointed to a troubling pattern of behavior.
Prosecution’s Strategy
The Crown sought to establish that Johnston’s behavior was not only non-consensual but calculated. Prosecutors noted similarities in both women’s descriptions, especially the removal of condoms without consent and acts of physical control.
Johnston’s Defense
Johnston denied all allegations, describing the encounters as “fast, energetic, maybe a bit passionate,” but completely consensual. He admitted to being surprised by the accusations and accused the women of fabricating the claims.
The Verdict
After considering all evidence, the jury returned a unanimous not guilty verdict on all three charges. The judge reminded the court of the importance of the presumption of innocence and that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution.
Johnston’s Reaction
Following the verdict, a visibly emotional Johnston said, “I’ve lost everything.” He revealed he had not sung in public since the allegations surfaced and that the case had a profound effect on his mental health. “There were times I didn’t want to be here anymore,” he said.
Despite his acquittal, Johnston acknowledged the challenges ahead in rebuilding his career and reputation.
Media and Public Response
Reactions to the verdict have been mixed. Supporters of Johnston expressed relief and sympathy, arguing that he was unfairly targeted due to his celebrity status. Others expressed concern about the chilling effect such verdicts might have on victims coming forward with assault allegations.
Advocacy groups reiterated the importance of ensuring both complainants and defendants are treated fairly in sexual assault cases.
Legal and Social Implications
This case sheds light on the evolving landscape of consent law, particularly around “stealthing” and sexual autonomy. It also highlights the emotional and professional toll public allegations can have on individuals, regardless of guilt or innocence. The ruling reinforces the critical legal standard: allegations, however serious, must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Conclusion
Andrew Johnston’s acquittal brings closure to a deeply contentious legal battle. As he moves forward, the case remains a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding sexual assault allegations, the burden of proof in criminal trials, and the reputational consequences for public figures caught in legal crossfire. While Johnston walks free, the court of public opinion continues to weigh the implications of this case.
FAQs
1. What charges was Andrew Johnston facing?
He was charged with two counts of rape and one count of sexual assault, stemming from allegations by two women.
2. What was the outcome of the trial?
Johnston was found not guilty on all charges by a jury at Southwark Crown Court.
3. What were the main claims against him?
Both women accused him of removing condoms during sex without consent and physically restraining or choking them.
4. How did Johnston respond after the verdict?
He expressed relief and spoke about the emotional and professional devastation the case caused him, including the end of his singing career.
5. What has been the wider public reaction?
Public opinion is divided, with some supporting Johnston and others focusing on the broader implications for victims of sexual assault.
