Siann Cawley, 27, sentenced to four years and three months after subjecting young boy to three weeks of torture whilst in her care
A woman who subjected a young boy to horrific abuse including burning him with cigarettes, forcing him to eat dog food, and locking him alone in a room for hours has been jailed for more than four years.
Siann Cawley, 27, from Fleetwood, Lancashire, was sentenced to four years and three months imprisonment when she appeared at Preston Crown Court on Monday, 7 October. The court heard disturbing details of systematic abuse inflicted on the child over a three-week period whilst he was in her care.
Judge [name not provided in source] condemned Cawley’s actions as she handed down the sentence, with the defendant beginning her term at HMP Styal, the closed category women’s prison in Cheshire.
Cawley had pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing on 2 September to charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, ill-treatment, neglect, and abandonment. The court confirmed that whilst Cawley is a mother herself, the victim was not one of her own children.
The catalogue of abuse revealed in court painted a harrowing picture of the child’s suffering during the three weeks he spent under Cawley’s care. Prosecutors detailed how the defendant had deliberately extinguished cigarettes on the boy’s body, leaving him with burn injuries that would have caused significant pain and lasting trauma.
In one of the most disturbing aspects of the case, the court heard that Cawley had forced the child to eat pet food, a degrading act that formed part of her pattern of systematic cruelty. The psychological impact of such treatment on a young child was emphasised during proceedings.
Perhaps equally troubling was evidence that Cawley had routinely locked the boy inside a room by himself for extended periods whilst she left the house entirely. This abandonment left the child isolated, frightened, and without access to basic necessities or any means of seeking help.
The boy suffered multiple injuries during his time in Cawley’s care, though the full extent of physical and psychological harm inflicted remains protected by reporting restrictions designed to safeguard the victim’s identity.
Child protection experts have expressed grave concern about the case, noting that the combination of physical abuse, psychological torment, and neglect represents one of the most serious forms of child maltreatment. The deliberate infliction of cigarette burns is particularly recognised as an extreme form of child abuse, often leaving both physical scars and deep psychological trauma.
The force-feeding of pet food represents a form of degrading treatment that child welfare specialists say can have lasting impacts on a victim’s relationship with food and their sense of self-worth. Such acts are designed to humiliate and dehumanise, causing psychological damage that often persists long after physical injuries have healed.
Lancashire authorities had been involved in the case, though specific details about how the abuse came to light have not been disclosed to protect the victim’s identity. The swift progression from charge to guilty plea suggests overwhelming evidence of Cawley’s crimes.
Preston Crown Court, which handles serious criminal cases from across Lancashire, heard the case as part of its regular schedule of child protection matters. The court has dealt with numerous serious abuse cases in recent years as authorities continue efforts to protect vulnerable children across the region.
Cawley’s sentence of four years and three months reflects the severity of her crimes, though campaigners for child protection have questioned whether such terms are sufficient deterrent for those who inflict extreme suffering on vulnerable children. Under current guidelines, she could potentially be eligible for release on licence after serving half her sentence, subject to parole board assessment.
She is now serving her sentence at HMP Styal, a closed category prison near Wilmslow in Cheshire that houses approximately 486 female inmates. The facility, which opened in 1962 on the site of a former orphanage, includes specialist units for vulnerable prisoners and those requiring mental health support.
The prison has faced scrutiny in recent years over high rates of self-harm amongst inmates and concerns about support for women with complex needs. However, recent inspection reports have praised improvements in rehabilitation services and prisoner-staff relationships.
For the young victim, the road to recovery will likely be long and challenging. Child trauma specialists emphasise that children who experience such severe abuse require extensive therapeutic support to process their experiences and develop healthy coping mechanisms.
The case has raised questions about oversight and safeguarding procedures, particularly regarding how the child came to be in Cawley’s care and what warning signs might have been missed during the three-week period of abuse. Authorities have not released details about these circumstances to protect the child’s privacy.
Local safeguarding boards routinely review serious cases to identify learning points and prevent future tragedies. Whether this case will trigger such a review has not been confirmed, though the severity of abuse would typically warrant examination of the circumstances.
Child protection charities have used the case to highlight the ongoing need for vigilance in identifying signs of abuse and the importance of creating environments where children feel safe to disclose maltreatment. They stress that burns, unexplained injuries, and changes in behaviour can all be indicators that a child is suffering abuse.
The NSPCC and other child welfare organisations continue to operate helplines for anyone concerned about a child’s welfare, emphasising that early intervention can prevent escalation of abuse and protect vulnerable children from serious harm.
As Cawley begins her prison sentence, the focus must remain on supporting the young victim and ensuring he receives the comprehensive care needed to overcome this traumatic experience. The case serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerability of children and the devastating impact of abuse by those entrusted with their care.
The court’s decisive action in imposing a substantial custodial sentence sends a clear message that society will not tolerate the abuse of its most vulnerable members, though questions remain about whether current sentencing guidelines provide sufficient deterrent and punishment for such extreme cruelty.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
