Hamas Agrees to 70-Day Ceasefire with Israel Under U.S. Proposal
In a significant development in the Middle East conflict, Hamas has agreed to a U.S.-mediated proposal that would initiate a 70-day ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. The proposed truce includes the release of 10 Israeli hostages and a temporary halt to military operations between Hamas and Israeli forces. This marks a major diplomatic step aimed at de-escalating months of intense fighting in one of the world’s most volatile regions.
The agreement follows weeks of secret talks facilitated by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, with mediation support from Egypt and Qatar. While Hamas has signaled its acceptance of the terms, Israel has publicly rejected the offer, complicating the path toward implementation.
Key Terms of the Deal
Hostage Release and Prisoner Exchange
According to sources familiar with the agreement, Hamas would release 10 living Israeli hostages in two phases. In return, Israel is expected to release dozens of Palestinian prisoners, many of whom have been held for years. This humanitarian gesture is seen as a critical trust-building step and a concession aimed at encouraging more comprehensive peace efforts.
Ceasefire Timeline and Military Clauses
The 70-day truce is intended to provide a window for humanitarian aid and further negotiations. The deal calls for a temporary withdrawal of Israeli military forces from certain sectors of the Gaza Strip and requires Hamas to halt all rocket attacks and armed activities. Airstrikes, border skirmishes, and drone surveillance are also to be suspended under the agreement.
The Role of U.S. Diplomacy
Steve Witkoff’s Involvement and Reaction
U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, who played a central role in drafting the proposal, expressed frustration with how Hamas interpreted the agreement. While Hamas claimed full acceptance, Witkoff later described their response as “disappointing and completely unacceptable,” suggesting there are gaps in understanding between both sides.
Despite this, U.S. officials believe the proposal remains a viable pathway toward peace if properly implemented and clarified.
U.S. Strategy to End Gaza Crisis
This ceasefire initiative is part of a broader American diplomatic effort to prevent further escalation in the region and stabilize the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The U.S. aims to maintain pressure on both parties while leveraging its influence through regional allies to broker a more durable solution.
Mixed Responses from Israel
Israeli Government Rejects Terms
The Israeli government, however, was quick to reject the proposal. Officials stated the agreement was “very far from the outline we are willing to negotiate on.” Israeli leaders remain concerned that the deal allows Hamas to regroup militarily while making only limited concessions.
Concerns About Security and Hamas Interpretation
Tel Aviv fears that Hamas’s acceptance of the deal might be a strategic move rather than a genuine step toward peace. Israel also disputes Hamas’s version of the agreement, particularly clauses concerning force withdrawal and prisoner releases.
Egypt, Qatar, and the Global Mediation Network
Behind-the-Scenes Negotiations
Diplomatic sources confirmed that Egypt and Qatar played key roles in mediating the ceasefire proposal. Both countries have long-standing relationships with Hamas and have acted as go-betweens in past negotiations with Israel.
Role of Third-Party Intermediaries
Palestinian-American businessman Bishara Bahbah reportedly acted as an unofficial intermediary, relaying messages between Hamas and the U.S. State Department. His involvement underscores the complex and often informal channels required to reach such sensitive agreements.
Humanitarian Implications for Gaza Strip
Aid Access and Civilian Relief
The proposed ceasefire could offer much-needed relief to the civilians of Gaza. The territory has endured months of relentless airstrikes, blockades, and power shortages. Humanitarian agencies have welcomed the truce, noting that 70 days could provide a critical window for aid distribution, medical assistance, and rebuilding efforts.
Risks of Re-escalation
However, aid groups remain cautious. Past ceasefires have collapsed within days due to violations or misinterpretations. Without full buy-in from both Hamas and Israel, the risk of renewed conflict remains high.
