Recent revelations have brought the financial activities of the Archewell Foundation, established by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, into the spotlight. The foundation has reportedly directed substantial funds toward individuals and organizations with strong ties to the U.S. Democratic Party, prompting debates about the couple’s political neutrality and potential involvement in American politics.
Financial Contributions to Democratic Affiliates
In 2023, the Archewell Foundation allocated $146,500 to Jiore Craig, a media strategist renowned for her expertise in countering disinformation and her association with Democratic campaigns. Craig previously held a senior position at Greenberg, Quinlan, and Rosner, a political consulting firm instrumental in President Bill Clinton’s 1992 election victory and subsequent Democratic endeavors. Additionally, in 2022, the foundation compensated Craig with $120,000 for her services.
Beyond payments to Craig, the foundation donated $25,000 to the Marcy Lab School in Brooklyn, where Craig serves on the board. Another notable contribution includes $90,000 to Markup News Inc., a non-profit organization supported by Democratic donors such as George Soros and Craigslist founder Craig Newmark. The largest recorded donation, amounting to $250,000, was directed to the Women’s Wellness Space, a Pennsylvania-based charity founded by Ashley Biden, daughter of President Joe Biden.
Political Neutrality and Public Perception
Traditionally, members of the British royal family are expected to maintain political neutrality. The Archewell Foundation’s financial support for Democratic-aligned entities has led to criticism, particularly from conservative commentators. Nile Gardiner, a foreign policy expert at the Heritage Foundation, has called for a congressional investigation into the foundation’s donations, arguing that royals should refrain from political involvement.
These financial decisions have led to criticism from conservative figures who question the couple’s adherence to political neutrality, a customary expectation for members of the British royal family. Nile Gardiner of the Heritage Foundation has called for scrutiny of Archewell’s political affiliations, stating, “Harry and Meghan still retain royal titles and should not be engaging in any way in political activity.”
Archewell Foundation’s Response
In response to the criticism, a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex emphasized their commitment to nonpartisan charitable work. The representative stated that the couple has not endorsed any political candidates and that their philanthropic efforts focus on mental health, digital safety, and social well-being. The donations, according to the spokesperson, are intended to support impactful initiatives without political bias.
Implications for Meghan and Harry
The controversy surrounding these donations may have several implications for Meghan and Harry:
Future Political Involvement: Speculation about Meghan Markle’s potential political ambitions has been ongoing. These financial contributions might fuel further discussions about her possible future in U.S. politics.
Public Image: Their perceived alignment with a specific political party could influence public opinion, especially among those who value royal political neutrality.
Royal Family Relations: Engaging in political activities might strain their relationship with the British royal family, which traditionally avoids political entanglements.
Conclusion
The Archewell Foundation’s significant donations to Democratic-affiliated individuals and organizations have ignited discussions about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s political neutrality and intentions. While their spokesperson asserts a commitment to nonpartisan philanthropy, the nature of these contributions continues to raise questions. As the couple navigates their roles outside traditional royal duties, the balance between their charitable endeavors and public perceptions remains a delicate matter.
