Shots have been fired outside Serbia’s parliament building in Belgrade, leaving one person injured in what President Aleksandar Vucic has labelled a “terrorist attack” amid escalating political tensions.
Footage circulating on social media showed a fire inside a tent near the parliament building, one of several erected by supporters of Vucic during ongoing anti-government protests that have gripped the capital.
Armed security forces were seen approaching the tent before gunfire rang out and flames erupted, though it remains unclear who fired the shots or how the blaze started.
57-Year-Old Man Shot, One Detained
Local reports confirmed one person, a 57-year-old man, sustained a gunshot wound and is being treated in hospital in stable condition.
One man has been detained in connection with the incident, with video shared on X showing an individual lying on the ground with his hands behind his back, surrounded by officers.
The swift arrest suggests authorities had suspects in mind or witnesses quickly identified the shooter.
Vucic: “Terrorist Attack”
President Aleksandar Vucic, who has led Serbia since 2017, described the incident as a “terrorist attack” – inflammatory language that suggests he views the violence as politically motivated rather than random criminality.
His characterisation of events will likely influence how authorities prosecute those involved and shape public perception of anti-government protesters.
Critics may view Vucic’s “terrorist” label as an attempt to delegitimise opposition movements by associating them with violence.
Timing: Anniversary of Train Station Tragedy
The shooting came just ahead of a planned 1 November rally marking the first anniversary of a devastating train station canopy collapse in Novi Sad that killed 16 people.
The tragedy, which occurred in Serbia’s second-largest city northwest of Belgrade, was blamed on corruption-based negligence and triggered massive youth-led protests against Vucic’s government.
The timing suggests the violence may be connected to the heightened political tensions surrounding the anniversary commemoration.
Gen Z Protesters Demand Early Elections
Serbia’s Generation Z protesters have been demanding Vucic schedule early parliamentary elections, accusing the populist leader of cracking down on press freedom and civil liberties.
The president has so far refused these demands, creating a political stalemate that has fuelled ongoing demonstrations.
Young Serbians view Vucic’s government as corrupt, authoritarian and responsible for the systemic failures that led to the Novi Sad disaster.
Pro-Government Tents Targeted
The tent where the fire broke out was one of several erected by Vucic supporters near parliament during the anti-government protests.
These counter-demonstrations represent attempts by the president’s base to show support and create a visible pro-government presence to offset opposition rallies.
The fact violence occurred at a pro-government tent complicates the narrative, as it’s unclear whether supporters or opponents initiated the confrontation.
Armed Security Response
Footage showing armed security personnel approaching the tent before shots were fired raises questions about whether police were responding to threats or their presence escalated tensions.
The sequence of events – security approach, gunfire, then fire – suggests a chaotic situation where multiple actors may have contributed to the violence.
Whether security forces fired weapons, protesters did, or both sides exchanged fire remains to be established.
Fire’s Origin Unknown
How the tent fire started remains unclear, with possibilities including:
- Deliberate arson by protesters
- Accidental ignition during confrontation
- Fire started by occupants
- Collateral damage from gunfire
Determining the fire’s cause will be crucial to understanding whether this was premeditated violence or a situation that spiralled out of control.
Novi Sad Collapse Anniversary
The 1 November rally in Novi Sad marks one year since the train station canopy collapse that killed 16 people and became a catalyst for Serbia’s current political crisis.
Investigators concluded the tragedy resulted from corruption and negligence in the renovation project, with proper safety standards ignored.
The disaster crystallised public anger at systemic corruption in Vucic’s government, particularly amongst younger Serbians who see it as emblematic of broader rot.
Youth-Led Movement
Serbia’s anti-government protests have been notably youth-driven, with Generation Z leading demonstrations against what they perceive as Vucic’s increasingly authoritarian tendencies.
Young protesters cite media censorship, rigged elections, lack of accountability for corruption, and the train station deaths as justifications for demanding change.
The generational divide mirrors protest movements across the Balkans and Eastern Europe where youth challenge entrenched political elites.
Vucic’s Authoritarian Drift
Opposition critics accuse Vucic of systematically dismantling democratic institutions during his eight years in power.
Allegations include:
- Cracking down on independent media
- Restricting civil liberties
- Manipulating elections
- Using state resources to benefit his party
- Tolerating corruption amongst allies
- Refusing accountability for failures like Novi Sad
Vucic denies these accusations, positioning himself as a strong leader providing stability.
Press Freedom Concerns
International watchdogs have documented declining press freedom in Serbia under Vucic, with independent journalists facing harassment and critical outlets losing advertising revenue.
The president’s allies control most major media outlets, creating an information environment heavily slanted toward government messaging.
This media dominance makes organising sustained opposition challenging, though social media provides alternative communication channels.
Early Election Demands
Protesters’ insistence on early parliamentary elections reflects their belief that only a fresh electoral mandate can break the political deadlock.
Vucic’s refusal to call early elections suggests confidence he can weather the protests without making concessions.
The standoff creates potential for escalating confrontation if neither side backs down.
Regional Context
Serbia’s political tensions occur against a broader Balkan backdrop of democratic backsliding, with similar concerns about authoritarian tendencies in Hungary, Turkey and other regional states.
Western observers worry about Serbia’s drift toward Russia and away from European Union standards for democracy and rule of law.
Violence Escalation Risks
Wednesday’s shooting represents a dangerous escalation from mostly peaceful protests to armed violence.
If political confrontations increasingly involve firearms, Serbia risks sliding toward more serious civil unrest.
Both government and opposition have incentives to prevent further violence, but heated rhetoric and entrenched positions make de-escalation difficult.
Investigation Crucial
Establishing who fired the shots, why, and how the fire started will be crucial for determining whether this represents:
- Rogue actors exploiting protests for violence
- Deliberate provocation by one side
- Security forces overreacting
- Spontaneous escalation of tensions
The investigation’s credibility will partly depend on whether authorities are seen as impartial or biased toward exonerating government supporters.
As Belgrade processes this violent incident and Novi Sad prepares for Thursday’s anniversary commemoration, Serbia faces a critical moment where political tensions risk boiling over into sustained violence unless leaders on all sides work to de-escalate.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
