Mohammed Umar Khan has been sentenced to detention for life with a minimum term of 16 years for murdering 15-year-old Harvey Willgoose in a knife attack at their Sheffield school.
Khan, who was 15 at the time of the February murder at All Saints Catholic High School, stabbed Harvey twice in the chest with a hunting knife he had brought to school, with one blow piercing his heart.
Mrs Justice Ellenbogen lifted Khan’s anonymity order earlier today, allowing him to be named publicly for the first time, and sentenced him to serve a minimum of 15 years and 106 days – effectively 16 years minus the 259 days he has already spent in custody on remand.
“You Will Remain in Secure Custody”
“You will remain in secure custody until the parole board decides you can be considered for release,” Judge Ellenbogen told Khan during sentencing at Sheffield Crown Court.
She explained that Khan would be detained in youth facilities initially, then transferred to an adult prison when he turns 18, as is standard procedure for serious youth offenders.
The mandatory life sentence means Khan will spend at least 16 years behind bars before becoming eligible for parole consideration, though he could remain imprisoned for far longer if deemed a continued danger.
“49 Seconds After You Stabbed Him, He Collapsed”
Describing the murder directly to Khan, the judge detailed the fatal attack: “You took the knife you had brought to school that day out of your left pocket, passed it to your right hand, and stabbed Harvey in the chest, twice.”
“49 seconds after you had stabbed him, he collapsed on the ground,” she added, emphasizing how quickly Harvey succumbed to his injuries.
The precise timeline demonstrates that Harvey had no chance of survival once Khan inflicted the fatal chest wound that pierced his heart.
“I’m Not Right in the Head”
The judge noted that immediately after the stabbing, Khan told a teacher: “I’m not right in the head.”
This admission, made in the immediate aftermath of the murder, became key evidence about Khan’s state of mind and awareness of his psychological problems.
Khan also told staff “you know I can’t control it,” which teachers interpreted as referring to his documented anger management issues.
Developmental Age Below Actual Age
Judge Ellenbogen acknowledged records showing Khan had an “inability to manage” his anger and that his developmental age was assessed at 14, below his actual chronological age.
These mitigating factors were considered during sentencing but ultimately didn’t substantially reduce the minimum term given the gravity of murdering a fellow student at school.
The judge also noted Khan’s degree of remorse and good attitude whilst in detention during the remand period.
Trauma to Family and Classmates
Balanced against these mitigating factors, the judge referenced the profound trauma Khan’s knife attack caused to Harvey’s family and his classmates who witnessed the murder.
Students fled in “fear and panic” as Khan attacked Harvey, with some locking themselves in cupboards to escape the violence.
The psychological damage to an entire school community witnessing one pupil murder another will likely persist for years.
Photos Posing With Knives
During the police investigation, officers found photographs on Khan’s phone showing him posing with hunting-style knives and a hammer.
These images demonstrated Khan’s fascination with weapons extended beyond simply carrying a knife for claimed “protection.”
The photos suggested a preoccupation with projecting a violent image rather than genuine self-defence concerns.
“Zombie Killer Knife” Searches
Khan’s internet search history included terms such as “zombie killer knife,” the judge revealed during sentencing.
These searches for extreme weapons demonstrate that Khan was actively researching knives in the period before bringing one to school and using it to murder Harvey.
The digital evidence painted a picture of someone planning to acquire weapons rather than stumbling into carrying one.
Background to the Murder
Harvey and Khan fell out following an incident at All Saints on 29 January, five days before the fatal stabbing, when Khan tried to intervene in an altercation between other boys.
When Khan claimed one boy had a knife, the school declared a lockdown and called police, though no weapon was found.
Harvey wasn’t at school that day and stayed home for the rest of the week, texting his father: “Am not going in that school while people have knives.”
The tragic irony is that Harvey’s fear of knife-carrying students proved devastatingly accurate when he returned to school on 3 February.
Social Media Argument Escalated Tensions
Over the weekend before the murder, Harvey and Khan argued on social media, with each siding with different boys involved in the lockdown incident.
These online exchanges escalated tensions that would explode into fatal violence when both returned to school on Monday.
Lied About Having Weapon
When Khan arrived at school on 3 February, a staff member asked whether he had anything he shouldn’t have.
Khan falsely said he did not, concealing the hunting knife he would use to murder Harvey just hours later.
The lie demonstrated premeditation and intent to deceive staff who might have prevented the tragedy.
Attack During Lunch Break
After a series of encounters throughout the morning, Khan pulled out the knife and attacked Harvey just after the lunch break began at 12.10pm.
The timing – during a busy period when students were moving around freely – meant numerous witnesses observed the horrific attack.
Family Campaign for Knife Arches
Since Harvey’s death, his family has campaigned against knife crime with particular focus on getting knife detection arches installed in schools.
Harvey’s sister Sophie paid tribute after Khan’s conviction: “Harvey was full of life, warm, funny and caring with a unique ability to bring people together. He was deeply loved by his family, cherished by his friends, and respected by all who knew him.”
“This tragedy has not only devastated our family, but has rippled across the country,” she added. “People everywhere continue to grieve the loss of our beautiful boy.”
16-Year Minimum Term
The 16-year minimum term reflects the seriousness of murder whilst accounting for Khan’s age and mitigating circumstances.
Had Khan been an adult, the minimum term for murdering someone with a knife brought to the scene would likely have been substantially higher.
Youth offenders receive lower minimum terms than adults for equivalent crimes, recognizing their reduced culpability and greater capacity for rehabilitation.
Parole Eligibility Not Guarantee of Release
Crucially, reaching the 16-year minimum term only makes Khan eligible for parole consideration – it doesn’t guarantee release.
The parole board will assess whether Khan still poses a danger to the public before approving any release on licence.
Many life sentence prisoners serve significantly longer than their minimum terms before parole boards judge them safe for conditional freedom.
As Khan begins his life sentence for robbing Harvey Willgoose of his future, the 16-year minimum term represents an attempt to balance justice for the victim, accountability for the perpetrator, and recognition that the murderer was himself still a child when he committed this devastating crime.
Follow for more updates on Britannia Daily
