A tribute to WWII hero John ‘Paddy’ Hemmingway was dramatically interrupted in the House of Lords when protesters threw confetti and shouted slogans, forcing a temporary suspension of proceedings. The demonstrators, reportedly from a pro-democracy activist group, demanded reforms to the unelected House of Lords, calling for a “House of the People” instead.
This unexpected disruption has sparked debate over parliamentary reform, the role of protests in democracy, and respect for national heroes. Here’s a full breakdown of what happened, the motivations behind the protest, and the reactions from politicians and the public.
What Happened in the House of Lords?
The Tribute to WWII Hero John ‘Paddy’ Hemmingway
- The session was dedicated to commemorating John ‘Paddy’ Hemmingway, one of the last surviving World War II veterans.
- The tribute was part of preparations for the 80th anniversaries of Victory in Europe (VE) and Victory over Japan (VJ) Days.
- Baroness Twycross, the culture minister, was delivering a statement on these commemorations when the protest erupted.
Protesters Interrupt the Session
- Around six protesters seated in the public gallery suddenly stood up and began shouting slogans.
- They threw confetti and leaflets into the chamber, halting the proceedings.
- Their chants included “Lords out, people in!”, calling for the abolition of the House of Lords.
Who Were the Protesters and What Do They Want?
The protest was organized by a pro-democracy group called “Time to Assemble.”
Their Demands:
- Abolish the unelected House of Lords and replace it with a citizens’ assembly chosen by lottery (known as “sortition”).
- A “House of the People” instead of what they call a system dominated by “aristocrats and oligarchs.”
- Greater representation for ordinary citizens, including postmen, nurses, teachers, and parents.
- More direct involvement of everyday people in tackling major issues like the cost of living crisis, housing shortages, and climate change.
Their leaflets argued that the current Lords system is outdated and undemocratic, claiming it prioritizes wealth and connections over merit.
Immediate Impact: Suspension of Parliamentary Proceedings
How Long Was Parliament Suspended?
- The House of Lords was briefly suspended for around five minutes.
- Security officials quickly escorted the protesters out of the chamber.
- The session resumed afterward, with politicians condemning the disruption.
Security Response
- The incident raises concerns over security protocols in Parliament.
- Despite the protest being peaceful, throwing objects (even confetti) into the chamber is seen as a potential security risk.
- There may be increased security measures for public access to Parliament in the future.
Reactions to the Protest
Politicians’ Responses
- Several members of the House of Lords condemned the timing of the protest, stating it was inappropriate during a tribute to WWII veterans.
- One Lord commented: “We will keep calm and carry on, just as they [veterans] would have done.”
- Others acknowledged the need for debate on Lords reform, but criticized the protest’s disrespectful approach.
Public Opinion: Support and Criticism
- Supporters of the protest argue it was a bold act of civil disobedience highlighting real democratic concerns.
- Critics say it was disrespectful to WWII veterans and distracted from important discussions on national remembrance.
Public opinion remains divided on whether this protest was an effective way to demand reform or simply an unwarranted disruption.
Why Is the House of Lords Controversial?
The House of Lords is often criticized as an unelected and undemocratic institution.
Key Issues With the Lords System:
1️⃣ Unelected Members: Peers are appointed, not elected, meaning no direct accountability to voters.
2️⃣ Hereditary Peers: Some members inherit their titles, a practice many view as outdated.
3️⃣ Wealth & Influence: Critics argue the Lords primarily represent elite interests, not ordinary citizens.
4️⃣ Size & Cost: The House of Lords has over 800 members, making it one of the largest legislative bodies in the world.
Should the House of Lords Be Reformed or Abolished?
There are three main views on the future of the Lords:
✔️ Keep It As It Is – Defenders argue the Lords provides expert oversight and prevents hasty laws from passing.
✔️ Reform It – Some suggest a partially elected chamber to increase democracy without losing expertise.
✔️ Abolish It – Others believe the Lords should be completely replaced with an elected assembly.
The protest has reignited this long-standing debate, putting renewed pressure on politicians to consider changes.
Historical Context: Previous Protests in Parliament
This is not the first time activists have disrupted parliamentary proceedings:
- 2023: Climate protesters threw orange powder in the House of Commons.
- 2019: Anti-Brexit activists staged a sit-in in the chamber.
- 2004: A protester threw purple flour at Tony Blair in the Commons.
These acts of civil disobedience are often controversial but can bring attention to overlooked political issues.
What Happens Next?
✔️ Security Review – Authorities will likely tighten public access rules to prevent future disruptions.
✔️ Continued Debate on Lords Reform – The protest has reignited calls for change.
✔️ More Public Awareness – Whether or not people agree with the protesters, the issue of Lords reform is back in the spotlight.
Conclusion
The interruption of a tribute to WWII hero John ‘Paddy’ Hemmingway by pro-democracy protesters has sparked a national conversation. While some see it as a disrespectful act, others argue it was necessary to highlight democratic flaws in the UK’s political system.
With growing public pressure for reform, this protest could be a turning point in the debate over the future of the House of Lords. Whether this results in real political change remains to be seen.
FAQs
1. Who was John ‘Paddy’ Hemmingway?
John ‘Paddy’ Hemmingway was a WWII veteran, one of the last surviving members of RAF Bomber Command. He fought in key battles and was honored for his service.
2. Why did protesters disrupt the House of Lords?
They were demanding the abolition of the Lords and its replacement with a citizen-led assembly, claiming the current system is undemocratic.
3. Was anyone arrested after the protest?
No arrests have been reported, but the protesters were escorted out by security.
4. What is “Time to Assemble”?
It’s a pro-democracy activist group pushing for Lords reform and greater public participation in government.
5. Will this protest lead to changes in the House of Lords?
While it has reignited the debate, major political reform is unlikely to happen quickly without significant public and parliamentary support.
