In a new twist to one of the most controversial and enduring scandals to ever rock the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew has been seen in public for the first time since Virginia Giuffre—his most high-profile accuser—posted a shocking message from a hospital bed, claiming she had “four days to live” following a car crash in Australia.
The Duke of York appeared somber and stern-faced during a quiet outing in Windsor, a rare appearance following months of media silence and public scrutiny. His expression did little to hide the continued pressure mounting from his connection to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the persistent spotlight on Giuffre, who has again captured global headlines—not for legal developments, but for a bizarre social media post that’s being questioned by authorities.
The dramatic claims by Giuffre, and Andrew’s sudden reemergence, have reignited global interest in a scandal many hoped was fading into history. But with social media, conflicting reports, and lingering public distrust, this saga is far from over. Here’s everything we know so far.
Who Is Virginia Giuffre?
Virginia Giuffre (formerly Roberts) is perhaps the most well-known of Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers and has been a central figure in the legal and media storm surrounding Epstein’s sex trafficking network. She has repeatedly claimed she was groomed and sexually abused by Epstein and his associates as a teenager—a claim that includes Prince Andrew, Duke of York.
Giuffre alleges that she was trafficked to Andrew when she was just 17 and forced to have sexual encounters with him in London, New York, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Prince Andrew has consistently denied these allegations and maintains that he has no recollection of ever meeting Giuffre, despite a now-infamous photo of the two standing together in Ghislaine Maxwell’s home.
The scandal reached a boiling point in 2022, when Andrew settled Giuffre’s civil lawsuit out of court for a reported sum of around £12 million, without admitting any wrongdoing. Though the case never went to trial, the settlement effectively ended Andrew’s public royal duties and stripped him of several military titles and patronages.
Despite this, both figures have remained in the spotlight—Andrew as he attempts to rehabilitate his image, and Giuffre as she continues to speak out publicly against sexual abuse and powerful enablers.
The March 24 Car Crash in Australia
In late March 2025, Virginia Giuffre shocked followers with an Instagram post claiming she had been involved in a car accident so severe she was left with renal failure and just “four days to live.” The post included a photo of her lying in a hospital bed, her face pale and her tone grave.
The post rapidly went viral, drawing global media attention and sparking concern—and skepticism. Many users expressed sympathy and support, while others questioned the authenticity of her statement and demanded clarity.
What made the situation more confusing was that authorities in Western Australia soon contradicted Giuffre’s claims. Police confirmed there had been a minor crash involving a vehicle and a school bus on March 24 but stated that no one had suffered serious injuries.
This discrepancy raised eyebrows and further muddied the narrative. Was Giuffre exaggerating her condition, or was there a disconnect between the medical emergency she described and the initial police response? As of now, no independent verification of her “four days to live” claim has been issued by hospitals or legal representatives.
What’s clear is that the post succeeded in grabbing global attention and dragging Prince Andrew’s name back into the headlines, with immediate speculation about whether the incident would have any legal or reputational implications for him.
Prince Andrew’s Public Appearance
Just days after Giuffre’s hospital post ignited media firestorms, Prince Andrew was seen for the first time in public—appearing solemn and unsmiling during a walk in Windsor. Photographed by tabloids, he wore a dark overcoat and appeared deep in thought, accompanied by aides but not engaging with cameras or bystanders.
This appearance marked a rare outing for the Duke, who has kept an exceptionally low profile since stepping back from public life. Royal commentators speculated that the timing of his outing was not coincidental, possibly signaling an effort to quietly reassert a presence amid renewed media attention.
Observers noted his “stern” expression and tightly drawn features, suggesting stress or discomfort in the wake of Giuffre’s headline-grabbing claims. Some interpreted the walk as a strategic move to show calm in the face of controversy; others saw it as further proof that the scandal continues to weigh heavily on him.
While Andrew did not speak publicly or release any statement in response to Giuffre’s latest claims, insiders reportedly told journalists that he was “not surprised” by the development and remains steadfast in denying all allegations against him.
Conflicting Narratives: What the Police Say vs Giuffre’s Account
The most perplexing element of the story remains the stark contrast between Giuffre’s claims and official reports from Australian authorities. According to the police in Western Australia, the accident involving Giuffre’s vehicle and a school bus was considered “minor.” No critical injuries were documented, and no emergency warnings were issued.
Giuffre’s assertion of being in renal failure with only “four days to live” has not been confirmed by hospital officials or third-party sources. While it’s possible that she suffered complications not immediately recognized by emergency responders, the lack of medical confirmation has led some to question the post’s intent and accuracy.
This gap in information has also led to accusations of sensationalism. Critics argue that the post may have been designed to redirect public attention or solicit sympathy amid legal troubles, especially as it was revealed that Giuffre was recently charged with breaching a restraining order in Australia—a detail largely overshadowed by the car crash narrative.
For many observers, the contradictions between police statements and Giuffre’s personal account cast doubt on the legitimacy of her claims, even as others defend her right to tell her story and ask for compassion in a vulnerable moment.
